U.S. Supreme Court upholds ban on gender-affirming care for minors

ANALYSIS: The ruling in the “U.S. vs. Skrmetti” case sets a new precedent for restrictions on trans rights in America

The United States Supreme Court just issued a landmark ruling that will have resounding impacts on the rights of all trans people across America. 

In the case of the U.S. v. Skrmetti, the court ruled to uphold a Tennessee law that restricts doctors from providing medical care like puberty blockers and hormones to trans youth—functionally a ban on gender-affirming medical care for minors. 

In the 6-3 ruling, the court ruled that a law like this that permits treatment for cis kids but not trans kids is not discriminatory. Chief Justice John Roberts delivered the ruling, arguing that the law “exclude any individual from medical treatments on the basis of transgender status” but rather removes diagnoses like gender dysphoria from the range of treatable conditions. 

All three liberal justices dissented, with Justice Sonia Sotomayor arguing that the law specifically discriminates against trans youth. In the official dissent, she wrote: “By retreating from meaningful judicial review exactly where it matters most, the Court abandons transgender children and their families to political whims.”

We break down how this law and ruling could have a resounding impact on healthcare access and human rights across America.

Senior editor Mel Woods is an English-speaking Vancouver-based writer, editor and audio producer and a former associate editor with HuffPost Canada. A proud prairie queer and ranch dressing expert, their work has also appeared in Vice, Slate, the Tyee, the CBC, the Globe and Mail and the Walrus.

Keep Reading

Advocates mount new challenge to Alberta anti-trans law

Skipping Stone and Egale Canada are headed back to court to try and overturn Alberta’s youth gender-affirming-care ban

Dylan Mulvaney’s Broadway debut is about more than the backlash

Mulvaney’s casting in “SIX: The Musical” is the latest example of Broadway platforming trans stars
A side by side of Radclyffe Hall and her lesbian novel The Well of Loneliness, with was subject to censorship and obscenity laws

Inside the censorship campaign against this 20th century lesbian novel

Radclyffe Hall’s “The Well of Loneliness” was the target of obscenity laws in 1928

Publishers are acquiring fewer queer books due to U.S. book bans: Report

LGBTQ2S+ authors say they are seeing increases in rejections from publishers and significant decreases in royalties