U.S. Supreme Court upholds ban on gender-affirming care for minors

ANALYSIS: The ruling in the “U.S. vs. Skrmetti” case sets a new precedent for restrictions on trans rights in America

The United States Supreme Court just issued a landmark ruling that will have resounding impacts on the rights of all trans people across America. 

In the case of the U.S. v. Skrmetti, the court ruled to uphold a Tennessee law that restricts doctors from providing medical care like puberty blockers and hormones to trans youth—functionally a ban on gender-affirming medical care for minors. 

In the 6-3 ruling, the court ruled that a law like this that permits treatment for cis kids but not trans kids is not discriminatory. Chief Justice John Roberts delivered the ruling, arguing that the law “exclude any individual from medical treatments on the basis of transgender status” but rather removes diagnoses like gender dysphoria from the range of treatable conditions. 

All three liberal justices dissented, with Justice Sonia Sotomayor arguing that the law specifically discriminates against trans youth. In the official dissent, she wrote: “By retreating from meaningful judicial review exactly where it matters most, the Court abandons transgender children and their families to political whims.”

We break down how this law and ruling could have a resounding impact on healthcare access and human rights across America.

Senior editor Mel Woods is an English-speaking Vancouver-based writer, editor and audio producer and a former associate editor with HuffPost Canada. A proud prairie queer and ranch dressing expert, their work has also appeared in Vice, Slate, the Tyee, the CBC, the Globe and Mail and the Walrus.

Keep Reading

Renée Richards at a tennis match

The complicated legacy of Renée Richards

The former tennis player broke barriers for trans athletes in 1977. Then she changed her tune
Supporters of HIV AIDS research participate in the 2025 Toronto Pride Parade

Toronto man set to be the first Canadian cured of HIV

The patient received a stem cell transplant for his cancer that acted as a “double cure” because it contained a rare genetic mutation resistant to HIV
A photo of the outside of the New York Times building in New York City

Only 1 in 5 ‘New York Times’ news stories about trans issues quote actual trans people: report

A new 'Assigned Media' report found that the 'New York Times' rarely cited trans people in coverage about trans issues
A side by side of images from On Our Backs, a lesbian magazine.

The radical legacy of ‘On Our Backs’ magazine

“On Our Backs” filled a void by authentically documenting—and celebrating—lesbian sexuality
Advertisement