Virtual pervert

Online SM no substitute for real thing


She sent me a flirtatious e-mail. She said she was local, a bottom, and interested, so I did what almost any red-blooded polyamorous leatherdyke would do. I met her for coffee.

“Tell me about yourself?” I asked, over steaming cups of mocha.

“I have a lot of experience, but only with my ex-owner, who lives in Florida. We did really intense 24/7 dominance/submission, and some light SM for three years,” she said.

“Florida?” I asked. “When did you move here?”

“Move here? I’ve lived here all my life.”

“Oh! I’m sorry! You were having a long distance relationship. How often did you travel to see each other?”

She blinked at me: the slow blink that signalled I’d just said something foolish. “We’d always talked about visiting, but it never quite happened…”

It was my turn to blink. Then a metaphorical peanut bulb went on over my head.

This woman had never had a BDSM-related encounter up close and in the flesh. She was a virtual pervert; an “e-leatherdyke”. Although she was claiming years of kinky experience, I could only consider her a novice-just as I wouldn’t assume a Mortal Kombat player to be a real-life jiu-jitsu black belt.

Online chat can be community building, and a great way to spend free time. For the geographically remote, it can be an important lifeline to other queer perverts like ourselves-a hard thing to find in small towns. If we’re shopping for a play partner, reading their public opinions might be a good start, if it turns out that their private opinions match up.

And on-line sex talk and play? Certainly. It’s good, clean fun, can be very mentally stimulating, and saves on long-distance bills, when your favourite erotic morsel doesn’t share your area code.

But here’s the thing we can be fooled into forgetting: If we are doing it only on-line, we are not having sex; we are typing. (If ambidextrous, we may be masturbating and typing, but we are still not having sex.) We can’t submit to or dominate someone’s text-even their colourized 18-point text. A set of smiley and frowny graphics does not replace our play partner’s in-person range of emotions. And Ctrl-Alt-Delete, while handy, does not replace our safeword, and our trust in our play partners.

The internet has enormous potential as a tool for human flirtation and communication-not interaction. And if we are doing every single bit of our kinky play while pressed against the glass of our computer screens, we’re only window shopping for perversion. Let’s not cheat ourselves by assuming that’s all there is to SM.

* Elaine Miller spends too much time at her computer.

 
Read More About:
Love & Sex, Vancouver

Keep Reading

An illustration of three shirtless people with short hair holding each other with their eyes closed. There are hearts in the background.

I had a threesome with my monogamous partner, and it couldn’t have been better

There’s more than one route into opening a relationship—waiting for the perfect moment is a good way to start
Collage of photos including a bucket, ladle and brush on a sauna bench; feet resting against the leg of a person in a bikini who is sitting on a bench; and one person whispering into another's ear

The queer community still needs places for public sex

Sex party promoters, kink community leaders and educators refuse to shy away from the more explicit aspects of the queer experience
Illustration of an older person with their eyes closed, reaching toward a younger person with their eyes open and arms outstretched; both are floating against a golden background, surrounded by birds

What my trans son taught me about freedom

I thought I had to fight every day just to exist. Then my son showed me that sometimes freedom is quiet
Hands holding a smartphone; messages between someone marked by Pride colours and someone marked as a robot; a few floating rainbow hearts, all under a purple filter

Will AI companions usher in a new age of queer courtship?

Anyone in a relationship with an AI companion is already having a post-gender romance