U.S. airlines told to ignore ‘X’ gender markers

Travellers will have to be listed under “M” or “F” under a new rule stemming from Trump’s executive order on gender

Airlines in the U.S. have been told not to recognize “X” gender markers on passports, prompting confusion and concern among trans and non-binary travellers.

As of this month, a new rule is officially in effect, meaning the U.S.’s Advance Passenger Information System, which airlines use to submit passenger information to the government for international flights, no longer accepts “X” gender markers and mandates that passengers are marked with either an “M” or “F.” 

According to U.S. Customs and Border Protection, travellers won’t be denied flying because of the gender marker, but “the carrier or the traveler should select either ‘M’ or ‘F.’”

The new rule was introduced back in July, but with a 90-day grace period for airlines to adjust. That period is now over.

U.S. passports with an X remain valid travel documents—the U.S. district court of Massachusetts issued an order in June ensuring that they would remain valid after the Trump administration attempted to ban them under the president’s gender executive order. As for other countries, Canada has officially issued a warning to travellers that they could face problems entering the U.S. if they have an “X” gender marker on their passport.

But what happens if you do roll up to the airport for an international flight in or out of the U.S. with your X passport in tow? We break down what you need to know.

Senior editor Mel Woods is an English-speaking Vancouver-based writer, editor and audio producer and a former associate editor with HuffPost Canada. A proud prairie queer and ranch dressing expert, their work has also appeared in Vice, Slate, the Tyee, the CBC, the Globe and Mail and the Walrus.

Keep Reading

NYU Langone Health

Trans youth sue to block Trump admin’s access to private health records

NYU Langone Health was subpoenaed last month for information about minors who received gender-affirming care from 2020 to 2026
Drag queen Pattie Gonia and the outdoor apparel brand Patagonia

Patagonia v. Pattie Gonia: What the heck is going on?

Patagonia alleges that Pattie Gonia’s commercial use of a “near-copy” name poses “long-term threats” to their brand

What you need to know about new B.C. Conservative leader Kerry-Lynne Findlay

The new leader of British Columbia’s official opposition has said she’d ban gender-affirming care for young people if elected premier
A self portrait and collage by revolutionary queer photographer Claude Cahun

The queer photographer who fought fascism

Claude Cahun’s gender-bending self portraits were ahead of their time—and nearly erased from art history
Advertisement