Layton’s shadow cabinet

NDP Leader Jack Layton unveiled his shadow cabinet of Opposition critics today – or at least those critics related to government ministries. The list of 43 names contains a mix of rookie and experienced MPs (Layton declared that it’s a myth that MPs need to have experience), of whom 40 percent are women (including key posts such as finance). Apparently, there are additional critics to be appointed, which he didn’t outline at the beginning of the press conference.

Which is why I asked him this:

Dale Smith: You used to have a dedicated critic for LGBT issues in your shadow cabinet, and I don’t see one on this list. Is this no longer a priority for the NDP?

Jack Layton: Not at all. This is a preliminary list primarily to match up with the ministers in the cabinet. We will have a further set of announcements. I don’t think Harper has such a minister; I might have missed something on the list [at which point reporters were giggling], but you can be sure that our advocacy around these issues is, I think, quite well known and is going to be maintained.

With that said, Libby Davies is the only queer MP to get a shadow cabinet position, as the new health critic. Layton says that this is because he wanted one of his most experienced MPs to handle this critical file, given that we have the healthcare accords coming up for renegotiation in 2014. Davies’ old job of NDP House Leader moves to Thomas Mulcair.

The full list can be found here.

Keep Reading

Trans issues didn’t doom the Democrats

OPINION: The Republicans won ending on a giant anti-trans note, but Democrats ultimately failed to communicate on class

Xtra Explains: Trans girls and sports

Debunking some of the biggest myths around trans girls and fairness in sports

How ‘mature minor’ laws let trans kids make their own decisions

Canadian law lets some youth make medical or legal decisions for themselves, but how does it work?

To combat transphobia, we need to engage with the people who spread it

OPINION: opening up a dialogue with those we disagree with is key if we want to achieve widespread social change