Gay fired Canadian public servants want more than pardons

We Demand an Apology: group seeks more action from federal government


The Canadian government is considering pardons for people convicted of gay sex before its partial decriminalization in 1969 — but one group says that’s not enough.

“What we’re saying is that a pardon needs to be extended beyond 1969 to include all consensual homosexual activity, and it clearly must include an official state apology to people who were purged from the public service and the military,” says Gary Kinsman, a spokesperson for the We Demand an Apology network and a professor of sociology at Laurentian University.

The network, formed in March 2015, is an alliance of people who were purged from the public service and the military, as well as researchers and allies.

“The Canadian state has never apologized for this at all,” Kinsman says. “People’s careers were destroyed, their lives were destroyed, and nothing’s ever happened in terms of even an official apology to them.”

The federal government agreed to consider pardons following a Globe and Mail piece that investigated the life of Everett George Klippert, who was labelled a dangerous offender for consensual sex. Klippert’s case prompted the federal government to amend the Criminal Code in 1969 to decriminalize sex between two men, as long as they were both over 21 and the acts were taking place in private.

Despite the Criminal Code changes, Klippert remained imprisoned until 1971. And many gay people were still charged and convicted for a variety of offences related to consensual sex, such as gross indecency.

Alongside this continued criminalization, Kinsman estimates that thousands of gay men and lesbians were kicked out of public service jobs and the military between the 1950s and the 1990s.

There’s also a direct link, he says, between the criminalization of consensual homosexual activities and the national security campaigns against lesbians and gay men.

“This was one of the fundamental ways in which they got information on who was gay or lesbian in the public service and the military,” he says. Kinsman says people he’s spoken to claim the RCMP would threaten people with a Criminal Code offence unless they provided names of their lesbian and gay friends.

If any of the people named were in the military or worked as a public servant, that information would be used against them, he says.

 

“The other linkage is, of course, if someone in the public service and the military during that period of time was convicted or even charged with an offence for consensual homosexual activity they would also lose their position,” Kinsman continues.

The RMCP employed a variety of methods to root out gay people, he says, including the infamous “fruit machine,” a device that attempted to identify gay people by measuring their physiological responses while watching pornography.

Kinsman says an apology would be an important first step in addressing the many wrongs done by Canada to queer people.

“It will mean that the Canadian state will take responsibility for what it did during what I describe as the Canadian war on queers,” he says.

Read More About:
Power, News, LGBT Apology, Canada, Human Rights

Keep Reading

Job discrimination against trans and non-binary people is alive and well

OPINION: A study reveals that we have a long way to go to reach workplace equality for trans and non-binary people

The new generation of gay Conservative sellouts

OPINION: Melissa Lantsman’s and Eric Duncan’s refusals to call out their party’s transphobia is a betrayal of the LGBTQ2S+ community

Over 300 anti-LGBTQ2S+ bills have been introduced this year. This doesn’t mean we should panic

OPINION: While it’s important to watch out for threats, not all threats are created equally. Some of these bills will die a natural death

Xtra’s top LGBTQ2S+ stories of the year

The best and brightest—even most bewildering—stories from a back catalogue brimming with insight