Chipping away at DOMA one section at a time

BY NATASHA BARSOTTI – More than a year after the Obama administration said it would no longer defend the constitutionality of DOMA, a three-judge panel of the First Circuit Court of Appeals in Boston ruled a section of the law unconstitutional because it denies married gay couples the benefits heterosexual couples enjoy.

With that finding, the fight over the federal law former president Bill Clinton signed off on in 1996 may now head to the Supreme Court. The ruling was handed down in the same month Obama declared his support of gay marriage.

“Many Americans believe that marriage is the union of a man and a woman, and most Americans live in states where that is the law today,” the First Circuit ruling states. “One virtue of federalism is that it permits this diversity of governance based on local choice, but this applies as well to the states that have chosen to legalize same-sex marriage. Under current Supreme Court authority, Congress’ denial of federal benefits to same-sex couples lawfully married in Massachusetts has not been adequately supported by any permissible federal interest,” it concluded.

According to the Huffington Post, gay couples will not benefit from the May 31 ruling until the Supreme Court, which decides the constitutionality of laws enacted by Congress, rules on the matter.

This latest ruling follows that of two judgments in California earlier this year that say DOMA deprives married same-sex couples due-process rights.

Natasha Barsotti is originally from Trinidad and Tobago in the Caribbean. She had high aspirations of representing her country in Olympic Games sprint events, but after a while the firing of the starting gun proved too much for her nerves. So she went off to university instead. Her first professional love has always been journalism. After pursuing a Master of Journalism at UBC , she began freelancing at Xtra West — now Xtra Vancouver — in 2006, becoming a full-time reporter there in 2008.

Keep Reading

Trans issues didn’t doom the Democrats

OPINION: The Republicans won ending on a giant anti-trans note, but Democrats ultimately failed to communicate on class

Xtra Explains: Trans girls and sports

Debunking some of the biggest myths around trans girls and fairness in sports

How ‘mature minor’ laws let trans kids make their own decisions

Canadian law lets some youth make medical or legal decisions for themselves, but how does it work?

To combat transphobia, we need to engage with the people who spread it

OPINION: opening up a dialogue with those we disagree with is key if we want to achieve widespread social change