Australia: Court reserves judgment on challenge to ACT’s marriage bill

Gay couples given the go-ahead to marry before Dec 12 ruling

Ahead of a highly anticipated Australian High Court ruling regarding the validity of the Australian Capital Territory’s marriage equality bill, same-sex couples will reportedly have a limited time frame within which to say their “I dos,” The Australian reports.

In a suit filed with the High Court after the ACT in October became the first jurisdiction on the continent to allow gay marriage, the federal government contended that the measure is unconstitutional. The High Court today, Dec 3, decided to reserve judgment on the matter until Dec 12 and gave the go-ahead for gay couples to marry, the Australian Broadcasting Corporation (ABC) reports.

Determining who can marry is a matter governed by federal law, argues Australia’s solicitor-general, on behalf of the Commonwealth. That means a man and a woman, he says. But Sky News says his ACT counterpart counters that the territory’s law can exist alongside the federal law without conflicting with it.

Sky News quotes ACT’s solicitor-general, Peter Garrisson, as saying that the ACT’s measure is not at odds with the current federal Marriage Act, which “covers a particular form of relationship (between a man and a woman).”

According to ABC, at least 47 couples have filed applications to get married, with the first ceremonies scheduled for Dec 7. But it remains unclear what the status of married gay couples will be if the High Court overturns the ACT’s law, Sky News says.

Natasha Barsotti is originally from Trinidad and Tobago in the Caribbean. She had high aspirations of representing her country in Olympic Games sprint events, but after a while the firing of the starting gun proved too much for her nerves. So she went off to university instead. Her first professional love has always been journalism. After pursuing a Master of Journalism at UBC , she began freelancing at Xtra West — now Xtra Vancouver — in 2006, becoming a full-time reporter there in 2008.

Keep Reading

Democrats are done taking the high road

OPINION: Speakers were fired up at this week’s Democratic National Convention. For queer and trans people, that’s meant a more consistent defence of our rights

J.D. Vance’s appointment is a big threat to bodily autonomy

OPINION: The Trump VP pick’s statements about LGBTQ2S+ issues and abortion raise serious red flags

Job discrimination against trans and non-binary people is alive and well

OPINION: A study reveals that we have a long way to go to reach workplace equality for trans and non-binary people

The new generation of gay Conservative sellouts

OPINION: Melissa Lantsman’s and Eric Duncan’s refusals to call out their party’s transphobia is a betrayal of the LGBTQ2S+ community