New Mexico’s Supreme Court says yes to gay marriage

Unanimous ruling says barring people from marrying is unconstitutional


“We hold that the State of New Mexico is constitutionally required to allow same-gender couples to marry,” a ruling delivered by New Mexico’s Supreme Court says.

With the decision, New Mexico becomes the 17 American state to legalize gay marriage.

“Barring individuals from marrying and depriving them of the rights, protections, and responsibilities of civil marriage solely because of their sexual orientation violates the Equal Protection Clause under Article II, Section 18 of the New Mexico Constitution,” the decision states.

The court also dismissed the contention of gay marriage opponents that “defining marriage to prohibit same-gender marriages is related to the important, overriding governmental interests of ‘responsible procreation and childrearing’ and preventing the deinstitutionalization of marriage.”

The court noted that “the aged, the infertile, and those who choose not to have children are not precluded from marrying.” It also pointed out that New Mexico law recognizes gay couples’ right to raise children.

“We need not go further than the record in this case for persuasive evidence that same-gender parents are responsible parents,” the decision reads. “As we have previously discussed, many of the Plaintiffs in this case have been in long-term, committed relationships, and many of them are raising or have raised children and grandchildren.”

Referring to the US Supreme Court’s ruling in Loving v Virginia, which struck down laws prohibiting interracial marriage, the New Mexico court observed that it is “inappropriate to define the governmental interest as maintaining only opposite-gender marriages, just as it was inappropriate to define the governmental interest as maintaining same-race marriages in Loving.

Human Rights Campaign president Chad Griffin hailed the decision. “The court is entirely correct that denying lesbian and gay couples the same rights as everyone else is fundamentally unjust,” he says. “Regardless of where you live, all people should have the ability to marry the person they love, and now the legislature must not do anything to turn back the clock in the Land of Enchantment.”

Natasha Barsotti is originally from Trinidad and Tobago in the Caribbean. She had high aspirations of representing her country in Olympic Games sprint events, but after a while the firing of the starting gun proved too much for her nerves. So she went off to university instead. Her first professional love has always been journalism. After pursuing a Master of Journalism at UBC , she began freelancing at Xtra West — now Xtra Vancouver — in 2006, becoming a full-time reporter there in 2008.

Keep Reading

Trans issues didn’t doom the Democrats

OPINION: The Republicans won ending on a giant anti-trans note, but Democrats ultimately failed to communicate on class

Xtra Explains: Trans girls and sports

Debunking some of the biggest myths around trans girls and fairness in sports

How ‘mature minor’ laws let trans kids make their own decisions

Canadian law lets some youth make medical or legal decisions for themselves, but how does it work?

To combat transphobia, we need to engage with the people who spread it

OPINION: opening up a dialogue with those we disagree with is key if we want to achieve widespread social change