Anti-gay blood ban still under review

For Hossein Kia, a 21-year-old communications student at Simon Fraser University, giving blood is about making a difference in someone else’s life.

But after visiting the Canadian Blood Services’ (CBS) website to learn how, he was shocked to discover that “all men who have had sex with another man, even once, since 1977 are indefinitely deferred” from donating blood.

He voiced his frustrations in a letter to CBS’ chief executive officer, Dr Graham Sher. “While [your] statement explicitly refers to a behaviour, it also implicitly discriminates against self-identified gay men, primarily because the act of homosexual intimacy is a defining characteristic of men associated with this sexual orientation,” Kia told him.

In addition to sending his letter to Sher, Kia posted it on the web along with an online petition at www.stopdiscrimination.net. In three weeks, he has collected over 360 signatures supporting his position.

“I was very surprised because I expected mostly friends and colleagues to sign, but most of the people on [it] are people that I don’t know. I’m very thankful for whoever has supported that,” he says.

Kia admits that he has received both positive and negative responses since declaring himself on this issue. “It’s been a good ride,” he says, “because I have been exposed to a lot of different points of view. In many ways my position has become stronger even after conflicting points of view have been brought to my attention.”

When contacted at his office in Ottawa, CBS spokesperson Ron Vezina says he’s aware of Kia’s letter and petition.

“We responded to the individual and let him know about our policy and why it’s in place,” he says. Upon further questioning, Vezina concedes that, “I don’t know whether he has received [our response] yet, or if it’s in the process of being signed, but I know that I have seen a response to him.”

CBS began reviewing its policy barring men who have sex with men in 2005. It maintains that removing the ban could increase the risk of the blood supply.

Critics maintain that the policy is homophobic, barring all gay men regardless of how safely they have sex–despite the existence of precise HIV detection tests.

CBS hoped to conclude its policy review by the end of this year, but it looks like that goal will not be met.

“We’ve got an external epidemiological group looking at the risk assessments,” Vezina says. “Originally, we were hopeful that we would get a recommendation by the end of this calendar year, but it is looking now like the spring. It’s a really complex thing looking at this from many different angles.”

To date, Kia has received no response from CBS.

Keep Reading

Job discrimination against trans and non-binary people is alive and well

OPINION: A study reveals that we have a long way to go to reach workplace equality for trans and non-binary people

The new generation of gay Conservative sellouts

OPINION: Melissa Lantsman’s and Eric Duncan’s refusals to call out their party’s transphobia is a betrayal of the LGBTQ2S+ community

Over 300 anti-LGBTQ2S+ bills have been introduced this year. This doesn’t mean we should panic

OPINION: While it’s important to watch out for threats, not all threats are created equally. Some of these bills will die a natural death

Xtra’s top LGBTQ2S+ stories of the year

The best and brightest—even most bewildering—stories from a back catalogue brimming with insight