Oklahoma lawmakers are pushing one of the most restrictive anti-trans medical care bills yet

The bill, which was filed by Rep. Jim Olsen, could force trans people under the age of 21 to medically detransition, if they’ve already begun transitioning

Lawmakers in the state of Oklahoma are pushing a bill that could potentially force trans people under the age of 21 to detransition in what activists say may be the harshest anti-trans state legislation introduced this year.

The bill, titled House Bill 1011, would ban medical transition of anyone under the age of 21, making it a felony for doctors to provide patients 20 years old and under with gender-affirming healthcare. It was filed by State Representative Jim Olsen, who has called it “irresponsible for anybody in healthcare to provide or recommend life-altering surgeries that may later be regretted,” according to the local news station KFOR.

In addition to the forcible removal of gender-affirming healthcare for people under the age of 21, Section 2B of the prospective law criminalizes healthcare professionals —including mental health practitioners—who refer them to other professionals who are able to provide gender-affirming healthcare. Activists are sounding the alarm over the bill’s broad definition of gender-affirming care, as well, with one section defining it as any medication or procedure that “alters or removes the physical or anatomical characteristics that are typical for the individual’s biological sex,” which could presumably even include facial hair removal.

According to Erin Reed, a trans researcher and activist who tracks anti-LGBTQ+ legislation, stripping gender-affirming care from trans people who already rely on it could exacerbate existing threats of violence against LGBTQ2S+ people, with a record number of anti-trans legislation fueling violence against the demographic this year.

“We are witnessing the Overton window on gender-affirming care move in real time,” Reed noted in a Substack post. “Whereas just a few years ago, all of the transgender bills were about bathrooms and sports, now they have become increasingly eliminationist in attempting to forcibly detransition all transgender people.”

HB 1011 is not the first development in targeting gender-affirming healthcare for trans adults this year. Texas Republicans called for a ban of gender-affirming care for anyone under the age of 21 in June, while Missouri legislators proposed raising the legal age of gender-affirming care to 25 back in April. Florida governor Ron DeSantis pulled the plug on gender-affirming care coverage for adults on Medicaid in August. 

Research has shown that gender-affirming health care saves lives by improving people’s mental health. According to a study authored by researchers at Harvard, the Massachusetts General Hospital and Fenway Health last year showed a 42 percent reduction of psychological distress, and a 44 percent reduction in suicidal ideation among trans subjects who had received gender-affirming surgical procedures. 

According to another study authored by the Fenway Institute and the Massachusetts General Hospital last year, 13.1 percent of people who currently identify as trans say they have detransitioned at some point in their lives. However, 82.5 percent of those people attribute their decision to external factors such as pressure from family and increased vulnerability to violence and descrimination. 


The bill will likely be a topic of debate among lawmakers during Oklahoma’s legislative session in February. If passed, it will join the ranks of several other anti-trans measures passed by the state’s lawmakers—including an anti-trans bathroom bill targeting students, a law barring trans youth from playing on the sports team that matches their gender and a ban on non-binary birth certificates.

Ursula Muñoz-Schaefer

Ursula Muñoz S. (she/her) is a freelance writer and reporter based in Puerto Rico. She speaks English, Spanish and German and has previously written for news outlets in South Florida and West Texas. Her work has been recognized by Florida's Society of Professional Journalists.

Keep Reading

Sperm donation rules in Canada have changed. Here’s why that matters

Health Canada’s new regulations mean people won’t be prohibited from donating sperm based on their sexual orientation. But some restrictions remain

Does the Canadian Blood Services apology go far enough?

The apology to LGBTQ2S+ Canadians for a former donation ban is a good step, but more needs to be done to repair harm and build trust

Could Canadian anti-trans policies foreshadow abortion rights rollbacks?

Pro-life campaigns are already connecting the dots between Alberta premier Danielle Smith’s anti-trans policies and their own agendas

Inside TransCare+, a new Canadian directory of trans health resources

This new site site aims to be the one-stop shop for Canadian trans healthcare