Long-term care facilities: the final frontier?

Conference hears master's project on gays in care


SWAG. No, it isn’t anything illegal. The initials stand for Social Workers in Aging and Gerontology. On May 26, SWAG met in an Ottawa elder-care residence to talk about long-term care (LTC) for gays and lesbians.

LTC is part of a spectrum of housing for the elderly. It is more intensive care than what’s given in a seniors’ residence, with medical staff on hand around the clock.

Erin Richards, whose master’s work was on the subject of gays in long-term care, presented her findings. Her audience took an active part in sharing their own professional experiences.

Richards is a stay-at-home mom for her eight-month-old daughter, but before doing her undergrad and master’s of social work at Carleton, she spent four years working in LTC homes. During that time, she noticed that none of the residents ever self-identified as gay or lesbian, but she thought it unrealistic to believe that none were. She remarked that gays and lesbians in LTC can be targets for three kinds of discrimination: heterosexism, ageism and ableism.

The research for her thesis involved interviews with small groups of older gays and lesbians in Ottawa and Peterborough about the possibility of living in an LTC facility as they age. Her participants were often afraid — afraid of other residents, of staff and of the wider community. There was even fear of physical aggression. Participants in the groups were adamant about not wanting a facility, LTD or retirement home, connected with any religious community.

Some people in the groups would prefer a totally queer setting; some would prefer a sex-segregated environment. The idea of a queer setting would involve both residents and staff. Others in the groups favoured integration in a setting that would allow them to affirm their identity.

Richards suggested three ways to make LTC facilities more gay-friendly. First, she called for building and strengthening community partnerships, including with the queer community. Second, she saw the need for active participation of lesbians and gays in all levels of LTC. Such participation includes volunteering with residents and taking part in diversity training for staff and residents. She also focused on other people who have contact with the homes, such as paramedics.

Finally, overall policy needs to be overtly gay-positive, for example, using the rainbow flag, staff with rainbow pins, and use of language that does not make hetero assumptions. Policy should always consider implications for gay-lesbian identity. A zero-tolerance policy for discrimination is a must.

Richard also attempted to survey LTC administrators but got back only five out of 28 questionnaires. One SWAG participant related a story about trying to get a bed for a man who was HIV-positive. She ran into all kinds of resistance.

 

But that could change. Richards points out that baby boomers entering LTC are less willing to tolerate conditions that older gays and lesbians felt that they had to accept.

Read More About:
Health, News, Sex, Ottawa

Keep Reading

A hand putting a ballot with a question mark on it into a ballot box. The background is stars from a U.S. flag; below are trans flag coloured diagonal stripes.

The 2024 election is taking a toll on trans mental health. Here’s how to keep it together

ANALYSIS: Telling trans people to “just vote” isn’t helpful 

Busting the myths around transition regret and detransition

How many people regret their decision to receive gender-affirming care? Do people who detransition always regret their transitions?

What does U=U mean?

We break down ‘Undetectable equals Untransmittable,’ and what you should know about HIV treatment and prevention

Why can’t people stop fixating on ‘transition regret’?

OPINION: The mainstream “detransition” conversation is informed by transphobia, ignorance of trans history and collective denial of trans lives. Until we reckon with those realities, we won't resolve the debate